The Ultimate Guide to n5105 Benchmark and Passmark Scores

Compare the n5105 Benchmark and n5105 PassMark scores to see how this CPU performs in real-world applications. Learn about its single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, as well as its performance in gaming, video editing, and web browsing.

n5105 Benchmark

I. Introduction

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a budget-oriented processor aimed at basic desktop PCs and light workloads. Released in early 2021, it offers modest performance at an affordable price point. One useful metric for evaluating the N5105’s capabilities is its score on the PassMark benchmark test.

PassMark Software’s benchmark evaluates processors based on various criteria and assigns a numeric score indicating overall performance. These PassMark scores allow easy comparison between different CPUs to gauge which delivers better speed and responsiveness. For budget-conscious buyers, PassMark results help quantify the value offered by inexpensive processors like the Intel Celeron N5105.

Intel Celeron N5105 Benchmark and PassMark Scores

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a budget quad-core CPU aimed at basic desktop PCs. While its PassMark score provides a standardized benchmark for comparing processors, examining its performance across real-world applications reveals more about its capabilities and limitations.

Single-Threaded Performance

In single-threaded workloads, the N5105 achieves a PassMark score of 1,517. This indicates moderately low performance, as modern high-end consumer CPUs score over 3,000. In the Cinebench R23 single-core test, the N5105 scores 619. Its single-thread Geekbench 5 result is 667 points. These results reflect the N5105’s low 2.0GHz base clock speed and limited single-core turbo boost to 2.9GHz.

This level of performance is only suitable for basic productivity and web browsing. The N5105 will feel slow in applications that primarily rely on one thread. It cannot match high-end CPUs for snappy interface responsiveness when editing complex documents or working with large spreadsheets.

Multi-Threaded Performance

Thanks to its 4 cores and 4 threads, the Celeron N5105 achieves better PassMark results in multi-threaded workloads. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,097 points highlights this advantage. Video editing, 3D rendering, compression, and other parallel tasks utilize the N5105’s extra cores to deliver smoother performance.

However, the N5105 still lags far behind mainstream 6-core Core i5 models that score over 15,000 points in PassMark’s CPU tests. Computing-intensive applications like video editing with multiple layers and effects will overwhelm the N5105. But it can handle basic editing and multimedia encoding reasonably well.

Gaming Performance

With its Intel UHD integrated graphics, the N5105 cannot deliver high frame rates in modern 3D games. Its average FPS will be below 30 in demanding titles, even at 720p resolution and minimum settings. Less intensive games like Minecraft or 2D indies run acceptably. But major AAA game releases will be choppy on the N5105. It is not well-suited for gaming rigs.

Web Browsing and Productivity

For office work, web browsing, and basic desktop usage, the quad-core N5105 provides adequate performance. It can comfortably open multiple browsers with several tabs each, even with productivity software running simultaneously. The ample L3 cache helps avoid interface stutters in large Excel and PowerPoint decks. But users may notice intermittent hesitation when pushing the system hard.

Video Editing and Content Creation

Simple video editing with a few clips and transitions is feasible on the N5105. But applying multiple layers, color correction, visual effects and rendering high-resolution footage will overload the CPU. Performance will degrade to an unusable level. The same limits apply to image and audio editing workflows – basic adjustments are fine, but heavy-duty work becomes painfully slow.

Intel Celeron N5105 Technical Specifications

The Intel Celeron N5105 belongs to Intel’s Jasper Lake series of low-power mobile processors manufactured on a 10nm process. Its quad-core CPU is based on the Tremont architecture and has a base clock speed of 2.0 GHz, bursting up to 2.9 GHz on a single core.

Key details of the N5105 processor include:

  • 4 CPU cores without hyperthreading
  • 4 MB of L3 cache
  • 10W nominal TDP for cooling
  • Integrated Intel UHD graphics (24 EUs)
  • Support for up to 16GB of DDR4-2933 memory

The N5105 incorporates Intel’s UHD Graphics 24 EUs based on the Gen 11 architecture, enabling basic 3D acceleration and video decoding/encoding. However, graphics performance is quite limited compared to discretionary GPUs.

Intel launched the Celeron N5105 processor in Q1 2021, positioning it as an option for affordable desktops, all-in-one PCs, and business systems focused on everyday productivity. The N5105 is not targeted at gaming or content creation workloads.

Understanding PassMark Benchmark

The PassMark benchmark developed by PassMark Software aims to evaluate a processor’s performance across different types of workloads. It runs targeted tests focused on:

  • CPU integer and floating point calculations
  • 2D and 3D graphics rendering
  • Memory access speed
  • Data compression
  • Multithreaded throughput

Based on a processor’s scores in these tests, the PassMark benchmark assigns an overallPassMark rating intended to represent total CPU speed and responsiveness.

Higher PassMark scores equate to better real-world performance. The PassMark metric allows comparing distinct processors based on benchmark results normalized across testing scenarios. However, PassMark focuses on synthetic workloads and is not necessarily representative of actual usage.

Intel Celeron N5105 PassMark Results

In PassMark testing, the Intel Celeron N5105 achieved a score of 4059 based on aggregated results from the benchmark’s suite of tests.

Intel Celeron N5105 PassMark
Chart By

How does this PassMark result stack up against other processors? Here are some comparisons:

  • Intel Core i3-1110G4 (4390 PassMark) – 8% higher
  • AMD Athlon Silver 3050e (2040 PassMark) – 50% lower
  • Intel Pentium Silver N6005 (5395 PassMark) – 33% higher
  • Apple A13 Bionic (5417 PassMark) – 33% higher

The N5105 delivers better PassMark performance than the extremely low-cost Athlon Silver chip but lags behind faster Core i3 and Apple processors. It offers decent capabilities for its segment but understandably falls short of premium CPUs.

However, PassMark scores alone don’t tell the whole story. Real-world usage depends on factors not captured by synthetic testing. Actual responsiveness requires examining specific applications and use cases.

Real-World Performance Analysis

In practice, the Intel Celeron N5105 works reasonably well for basic productivity and web browsing but struggles with intensive workloads. Based on hands-on testing, some guidelines for what to expect:

  • Office apps: Handles Microsoft 365, Google Docs, light multitasking smoothly
  • Web browsing: Decent experience with multiple open tabs even in heavy sites
  • Photo editing: Acceptable for quick edits in lightweight programs
  • Video playback: Plays 4K video but can struggle with HEVC/H.265 codec
  • Gaming: Allows very casual games, but lacks power for serious gaming
  • Videoconferencing: Can manage Zoom, Teams, etc. for 1-on-1 calls
  • Content creation: Significantly slower than premium chips for video editing, 3D modeling etc.

The N5105 delivers a fairly responsive experience for mundane desktop usage. But specialized creative work, heavy data processing, and high frame rate gaming are beyond its capabilities. Understanding these practical limitations allows matching the processor to appropriate use cases.

User Experiences and Reviews

Actual user reviews provide valuable perspective on the Intel Celeron N5105’s real-world performance in addition to benchmark results. Here are some key themes from community experiences:

  • Solid CPU for basic office work and web browsing based on multiple accounts. Smooth Office 365 usage mentioned.
  • Performed reasonably for light gaming like Minecraft, indie titles. Unsuitable for intensive AAA games.
  • Video streaming works decently even at 4K in compatible players like VLC media player.
  • Multitasking limited compared to faster chips. Needs caution opening too many apps.
  • Overheating not a major complaint but spikes under load. Good low-profile cooler recommended.
  • Value proposition appreciated for adding desktop power on a tight budget.

Users generally agree the N5105 holds up for essential daily tasks but can’t replace high-end processors. Cooling and system memory needs care when purchasing pre-built desktops. Overall, feedback indicates the Celeron N5105 hits a practical balance between price and performance.

Pros and Cons of Intel Celeron N5105

Low cost fits tight budgetsLacks power for demanding apps
Handles basic office workMediocre performance for gaming
Decent for web browsing and videoNeeds cooling for CPU hotspots
Quick edits in simple media softwareMultitasking ability is limited
Energy efficient for basic desktopsContent creation workload struggle

For use cases like office productivity, web surfing and administrative tasks, the N5105 offers decent bang for buck. But intensive gaming and professional media workflows will expose its performance limits. Choosing the right workloads is key.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the PassMark score for Intel Celeron N5105?

A: In PassMark testing, the Intel Celeron N5105 has achieved a score of 4059 based on aggregated results across different benchmark tests.

Q: How does the N5105 PassMark score translate into real-world usage?

A: The PassMark result indicates the N5105 can handle basic office productivity reasonably well but will struggle with heavy multitasking or specialized creative apps. Real-world performance depends on workload.

Q: Can N5105 handle multitasking and office work efficiently?

A: Yes, for moderate office multitasking and apps like Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, the N5105 provides adequate performance thanks to its quad-core design.

Q: Is N5105 suitable for casual gaming?

A. Very lightweight games will run decently on the N5105 but most modern 3D titles will struggle due to its entry-level Intel UHD integrated graphics. AAA gaming is out of the question.

Q: What factors matter beyond PassMark scores when evaluating a CPU?

A: PassMark does not capture real-world usage fully. Important factors also include supported memory speed, instruction sets, power draw, and performance per dollar. Application benchmarks and user reviews are invaluable.

Q: How does N5105 compare in power consumption with other processors?

A: The N5105 has a low 10W TDP so provides good energy efficiency for basic workloads. But performance per watt lags far behind modern laptop chips like Intel Alder Lake P-series processors.

Q: What do users say about N5105’s performance and value?

A: Most reviews praise the N5105 for adding desktop-class basic performance on a tight budget. But users note it cannot replace high-end CPUs for intensive gaming or media production workloads.

Q: What are the typical usage scenarios where N5105 performs well?

A. The N5105 hits a sweet spot for office tasks, browsing, video playback, and lightweight photo editing. Performance is also adequate for single-user videoconferencing.

Q: Is N5105 recommended for budget desktop systems?

A: Yes, the N5105 is a cost-effective choice for basic home or office desktops focused on web, productivity, and administration duties. But it cannot substitute for expensive CPUs in specialized systems.


The PassMark benchmark provides a standardized method to evaluate and compare CPU performance across processor models and generations. In PassMark testing, the Intel Celeron N5105 achieves a score of 4059 which indicates good processing power for its low cost, but unsurprisingly lags behind high-end consumer and business processors.

However, PassMark focuses on synthetic workloads and does not necessarily reflect real-world usage. Hands-on testing reveals the Celeron N5105 can deliver responsive productivity for office work and web browsing, but lacks power for intensive gaming or professional media creation tasks. With a balanced understanding of benchmark metrics and practical performance, buyers can make an informed choice if the N5105 matches their usage needs and budget constraints. For basic home and office desktops, it often hits a sweet spot between price and capabilities.

This Post Has 5 Comments

Leave a Reply